You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Models and approaches for building knowledge translation capacity and capability in health services: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-024-01336-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olivia King, Emma West, Laura Alston, Hannah Beks, Michele Callisaya, Catherine E. Huggins, Margaret Murray, Kevin Mc Namara, Michael Pang, Warren Payne, Anna Peeters, Mia Pithie, Alesha M. Sayner, Anna Wong Shee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,712,059
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#856
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,880
of 310,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.