You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Event rates and incidence of post-COVID-19 condition in hospitalised SARS-CoV-2 positive children and young people and controls across different pandemic waves: exposure-stratified prospective cohort study in Moscow (StopCOVID)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-023-03221-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ekaterina Pazukhina, Mikhail Rumyantsev, Dina Baimukhambetova, Elena Bondarenko, Nadezhda Markina, Yasmin El-Taravi, Polina Petrova, Anastasia Ezhova, Margarita Andreeva, Ekaterina Iakovleva, Polina Bobkova, Maria Pikuza, Anastasia Trefilova, Elina Abdeeva, Aysylu Galiautdinova, Yulia Filippova, Anastasiia Bairashevskaia, Aleksandr Zolotarev, Nikolay Bulanov, Audrey DunnGalvin, Anastasia Chernyavskaya, Elena Kondrikova, Anastasia Kolotilina, Svetlana Gadetskaya, Yulia V. Ivanova, Irina Turina, Alina Eremeeva, Ludmila A. Fedorova, Pasquale Comberiati, Diego G. Peroni, Nikita Nekliudov, Jon Genuneit, Luis Felipe Reyes, Caroline L. H. Brackel, Lyudmila Mazankova, Alexandra Miroshina, Elmira Samitova, Svetlana Borzakova, Gail Carson, Louise Sigfrid, Janet T. Scott, Sammie McFarland, Matthew Greenhawt, Danilo Buonsenso, Malcolm G. Semple, John O. Warner, Piero Olliaro, Ismail M. Osmanov, Anatoliy A. Korsunskiy, Daniel Munblit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 2 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,750,638
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,236
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,049
of 340,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#26
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.