You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-189 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sam Eldabe, Michael Kern, Wilco Peul, Colin Green, Kristi Winterfeldt, Rod S Taylor |
Abstract |
Chronic radicular pain can be effectively treated with spinal cord stimulation, but this therapy is not always sufficient for chronic back pain. Subcutaneous nerve stimulation (SQS) refers to the placement of percutaneous leads in the subcutaneous tissue within the area of pain. Case series data show that failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients experience clinically important levels of pain relief following SQS and may also reduce their levels of analgesic therapy and experience functional well-being. However, to date, there is no randomized controlled trial evidence to support the use of SQS in FBSS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 133 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 18% |
Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
Psychology | 7 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
Other | 25 | 19% |
Unknown | 38 | 28% |