You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Disparities in child mortality trends: what is the evidence from disadvantaged states in India? the case of Orissa and Madhya Pradesh
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-12-45 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kim-Huong Nguyen, Eliana Jimenez-Soto, Prarthna Dayal, Andrew Hodge |
Abstract |
The Millennium Development Goals prompted renewed international efforts to reduce under-five mortality and measure national progress. However, scant evidence exists about the distribution of child mortality at low sub-national levels, which in diverse and decentralized countries like India are required to inform policy-making. This study estimates changes in child mortality across a range of markers of inequalities in Orissa and Madhya Pradesh, two of India's largest, poorest, and most disadvantaged states. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 32% |
Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 24 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 15% |
Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,369
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,715
of 1,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,269
of 196,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.