↓ Skip to main content

Atypical presentation of tight filum terminale with thoracic disc herniation: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atypical presentation of tight filum terminale with thoracic disc herniation: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, February 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13256-024-04371-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taiju Miyagami, Hidetoshi Nojiri, Satoru Okada, Kiichi Mitsumoto, Kosuke Uemura, Toshio Naito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,914,138
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#997
of 4,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,999
of 330,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#8
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.