↓ Skip to main content

Hypereosinophilic syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypereosinophilic syndromes
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2007
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-2-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florence E Roufosse, Michel Goldman, Elie Cogan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 17%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 45 34%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 21 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,486,963
of 25,320,147 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,237
of 3,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,956
of 77,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,320,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.