↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of active negative pressure peritoneal therapy for reducing the systemic inflammatory response after damage control laparotomy (the Intra-peritoneal Vacuum Trial): study protocol…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of active negative pressure peritoneal therapy for reducing the systemic inflammatory response after damage control laparotomy (the Intra-peritoneal Vacuum Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek J Roberts, Craig N Jenne, Chad G Ball, Corina Tiruta, Caroline Léger, Zhengwen Xiao, Peter D Faris, Paul B McBeth, Christopher J Doig, Christine R Skinner, Stacy G Ruddell, Paul Kubes, Andrew W Kirkpatrick

Abstract

Damage control laparotomy, or abbreviated initial laparotomy followed by temporary abdominal closure (TAC), intensive care unit resuscitation, and planned re-laparotomy, is frequently used to manage intra-abdominal bleeding and contamination among critically ill or injured adults. Animal data suggest that TAC techniques that employ negative pressure to the peritoneal cavity may reduce the systemic inflammatory response and associated organ injury. The primary objective of this study is to determine if use of a TAC dressing that affords active negative pressure peritoneal therapy, the ABThera Open Abdomen Negative Pressure Therapy System, reduces the extent of the systemic inflammatory response after damage control laparotomy for intra-abdominal sepsis or injury as compared to a commonly used TAC method that provides potentially less efficient peritoneal negative pressure, the Barker's vacuum pack.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Andorra 1 <1%
Unknown 121 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 11%
Student > Master 13 10%
Other 10 8%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 33 26%