↓ Skip to main content

Current insights in to the pathophysiology of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current insights in to the pathophysiology of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Published in
Gut Pathogens, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1757-4749-2-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theodoros Karantanos, Theofano Markoutsaki, Maria Gazouli, Nicholas P Anagnou, Dimitrios G Karamanolis

Abstract

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) represents a functional disorder of gastrointestinal tract without the presence of an anatomic defect, in which abdominal pain is relieved with defecation and is associated with altered bowel habits.IBS includes a wide range of symptoms while its pathophysiology is very complicated. Recent studies indicate that the most important mechanisms include visceral sensitivity, abnormal gut motility and autonomous nervous system dysfunction. The interactions between these three mechanisms make bowel's function susceptible to many exogenous and endogenous factors like gastrointestinal flora, feeding and psychosocial factors. Recent data indicate that according to the above mechanisms, the influence of genetic factors and polymorphisms of human DNA in the development of IBS is equally important.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 139 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 23%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 59 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 62 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,461,813
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#52
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,827
of 104,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.