You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Adoption of strategies to improve decision support in community mental health centers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-10-s1-a27 |
Authors |
Shari L Hutchison, Irina Karpov, Pat E Deegan, Kim L MacDonald-Wilson, James M Schuster |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 1 | 17% |
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
Psychology | 1 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,498,700
of 25,350,078 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,314
of 1,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,272
of 270,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#34
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,350,078 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.