You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with isolated ultrasound soft markers in pregnant women not of advanced maternal age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-024-03066-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yunyun Liu, Sha Liu, Jianlong Liu, Ting Bai, Xiaosha Jing, Cechuan Deng, Tianyu Xia, Jing Cheng, Lingling Xing, Xiang Wei, Yuan Luo, Quanfang Zhou, Dan Xie, Yueyue Xiong, Ling Liu, Qian Zhu, Hongqian Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#19,925,470
of 25,358,192 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,274
of 3,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,945
of 172,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#16
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,358,192 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.