You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a double-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Urology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12894-023-01364-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junyao Liu, Bin Zhang, Peng Qi, Xiaowei Ren, Duo Zheng, Yang He, Xu Zheng, Zhongjin Yue, Ye Li, Ningqiang Yang, Zhiping Wang, Junsheng Bao, Junqiang Tian, Li Yang, Zhenxing Zhai, Lingjun Zuo, Zizhen Hou, Jiaji Wang, Wei Wang, Hong Chang, Junhai Ma, Yunxin Zhang, Zhichun Dong, Zhilong Dong, Ganping Zhong, Hui Cheng, Pengyuan Lei, Zhongming Li, GongJin Wu, Panfeng Shang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,727,025
of 25,355,907 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#197
of 828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,955
of 186,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,355,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.