↓ Skip to main content

Cost-utility analysis of treating mild stage normal tension glaucoma by surgery in China: a decision-analytic Markov model

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-utility analysis of treating mild stage normal tension glaucoma by surgery in China: a decision-analytic Markov model
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, February 2024
DOI 10.1186/s12962-024-00523-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Di Song, Liwen Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,638,143
of 25,359,594 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#418
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,635
of 167,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,359,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.