You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Contextual effects: how to, and how not to, quantify them
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-024-02152-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tobias Saueressig, Hugo Pedder, Patrick J Owen, Daniel L Belavy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 8 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 2 | 7% |
| Ireland | 2 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 55% |
| Scientists | 12 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 40% |
| Engineering | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,661,405
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#200
of 2,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,174
of 353,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.