You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rectal laterally spreading tumors successfully treated in two steps by endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Gastroenterology, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-230x-10-135 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Italo Stroppa, Giovanni Milito, Raffaella Lionetti, Giovanni Palmieri, Federica Cadeddu, Francesco Pallone |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Librarian | 2 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 36% |
Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 68% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,759,109
of 25,381,384 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#1,579
of 2,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,209
of 191,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,384 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.