You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Preference for hotline versus mobile application/countdown-based mobile overdose response services: a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12954-024-00944-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William Rioux, Adrian Teare, Nathan Rider, Stephanie Jones, S. Monty Ghosh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
Unspecified | 2 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 33% |
Linguistics | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,580,985
of 25,381,384 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#691
of 1,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,396
of 197,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,384 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.