↓ Skip to main content

Development, reliability and factor analysis of a self-administered questionnaire which originates from the World Health Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview – Short Form (CIDI-S…

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 232)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development, reliability and factor analysis of a self-administered questionnaire which originates from the World Health Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview – Short Form (CIDI-SF) for assessing mental disorders
Published in
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1745-0179-4-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonella Gigantesco, Pierluigi Morosini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,646,137
of 25,390,203 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
#47
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,379
of 95,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them