↓ Skip to main content

B-type natriuretic peptides in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
B-type natriuretic peptides in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12890-016-0345-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathaniel M. Hawkins, Amit Khosla, Sean A. Virani, John J. V. McMurray, J Mark FitzGerald

Abstract

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have increased cardiovascular risk. Natriuretic peptides (NP) in other populations are useful in identifying cardiovascular disease, stratifying risk, and guiding therapy. We performed a systematic literature review to examine NP in COPD, utilising Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Fifty one studies were identified. NP levels were lower in stable compared to exacerbation of COPD, and significantly increased with concomitant left ventricular systolic dysfunction or cor pulmonale. Elevation occurred in 16 to 60% of exacerbations and persisted in approximately one half of patients at discharge. Cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with increased levels. Levels consistently correlated with pulmonary artery pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction, but not pulmonary function or oxygen saturation. NP demonstrated high negative predictive values (0.80 to 0.98) to exclude left ventricular dysfunction in both stable and exacerbation of COPD, but relatively low positive predictive values. NP elevation predicted early adverse outcomes, but the association with long term mortality was inconsistent. NP reflect diverse aspects of the cardiopulmonary continuum which limits utility when applied in isolation. Strategies integrating NP with additional variables, biomarkers and imaging require further investigation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 16 28%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Unspecified 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 34%