↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge brokering between researchers and policymakers in Fiji to develop policies to reduce obesity: a process evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge brokering between researchers and policymakers in Fiji to develop policies to reduce obesity: a process evaluation
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-74
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gade Waqa, Helen Mavoa, Wendy Snowdon, Marj Moodie, Jimaima Schultz, Marita McCabe, Peter Kremer, Boyd Swinburn

Abstract

The importance of using research evidence in decisionmaking at the policy level has been increasingly recognized. However, knowledge brokering to engage researchers and policymakers in government and non-government organizations is challenging. This paper describes and evaluates the knowledge exchange processes employed by the Translational Research on Obesity Prevention in Communities (TROPIC) project that was conducted from July 2009 to April 2012 in Fiji. TROPIC aimed to enhance: the evidence-informed decisionmaking skills of policy developers; and awareness and utilization of local and other obesity-related evidence to develop policies that could potentially improve the nation's food and physical activity environments. The specific research question was: Can a knowledge brokering approach advance evidence-informed policy development to improve eating and physical activity environments in Fiji.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 24 16%
Librarian 10 7%
Other 8 5%
Other 37 24%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 25%
Social Sciences 36 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2013.
All research outputs
#5,944,417
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,021
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,928
of 194,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.