Title |
Knowledge brokering between researchers and policymakers in Fiji to develop policies to reduce obesity: a process evaluation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-74 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gade Waqa, Helen Mavoa, Wendy Snowdon, Marj Moodie, Jimaima Schultz, Marita McCabe, Peter Kremer, Boyd Swinburn |
Abstract |
The importance of using research evidence in decisionmaking at the policy level has been increasingly recognized. However, knowledge brokering to engage researchers and policymakers in government and non-government organizations is challenging. This paper describes and evaluates the knowledge exchange processes employed by the Translational Research on Obesity Prevention in Communities (TROPIC) project that was conducted from July 2009 to April 2012 in Fiji. TROPIC aimed to enhance: the evidence-informed decisionmaking skills of policy developers; and awareness and utilization of local and other obesity-related evidence to develop policies that could potentially improve the nation's food and physical activity environments. The specific research question was: Can a knowledge brokering approach advance evidence-informed policy development to improve eating and physical activity environments in Fiji. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Curaçao | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 147 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 18% |
Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
Researcher | 24 | 16% |
Librarian | 10 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Other | 37 | 24% |
Unknown | 20 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 36 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
Psychology | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 24 | 16% |
Unknown | 26 | 17% |