You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors affecting overall care experience for people living with rare conditions in the UK: exploratory analysis of a quantitative patient experience survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-024-03081-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Jones, Marie Cruddas, Amy Simpson, Nick Meade, Daphnee Pushparajah, Michelle Peter, Amy Hunter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,815,333
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,454
of 3,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,743
of 343,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#24
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.