You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of the effects of teaching through simulation and the traditional method on nursing students' self-efficacy skills and clinical performance: a quasi-experimental study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12912-022-01065-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marzieh Azizi, Ghobad Ramezani, Elham Karimi, Ali Asghar Hayat, Seyed Aliakbar Faghihi, Mohammad Hasan Keshavarzi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,131,564
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#86
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,479
of 437,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.