↓ Skip to main content

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a comparative treatment planning study of photons and protons

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a comparative treatment planning study of photons and protons
Published in
Radiation Oncology, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-3-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zahra Taheri-Kadkhoda, Thomas Björk-Eriksson, Simeon Nill, Jan J Wilkens, Uwe Oelfke, Karl-Axel Johansson, Peter E Huber, Marc W Münter

Abstract

The aim of this treatment planning study was to investigate the potential advantages of intensity-modulated (IM) proton therapy (IMPT) compared with IM photon therapy (IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 29 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2014.
All research outputs
#3,768,692
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#123
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,329
of 155,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them