You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consumption habits of pregnant women and implications for developmental biology: a survey of predominantly Hispanic women in California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-91 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah E Santiago, Grace H Park, Kelly J Huffman |
| Abstract |
Healthy post-pregnancy outcomes are contingent upon an informed regimen of prenatal care encouraging healthy maternal consumption habits. In this article, we describe aspects of maternal intake of food, drink, and medication in a population of predominantly Hispanic women in Southern California. Potential implications for unhealthy prenatal dietary choices are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 42 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#530,200
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#159
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,247
of 194,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#8
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.