↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of Hoxgene clusters in deuterostomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Developmental Biology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 372)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of Hoxgene clusters in deuterostomes
Published in
BMC Developmental Biology, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-213x-13-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Pascual-Anaya, Salvatore D’Aniello, Shigeru Kuratani, Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez

Abstract

Hox genes, with their similar roles in animals as evolutionarily distant as humans and flies, have fascinated biologists since their discovery nearly 30 years ago. During the last two decades, reports on Hox genes from a still growing number of eumetazoan species have increased our knowledge on the Hox gene contents of a wide range of animal groups. In this review, we summarize the current Hox inventory among deuterostomes, not only in the well-known teleosts and tetrapods, but also in the earlier vertebrate and invertebrate groups. We draw an updated picture of the ancestral repertoires of the different lineages, a sort of "genome Hox bar-code" for most clades. This scenario allows us to infer differential gene or cluster losses and gains that occurred during deuterostome evolution, which might be causally linked to the morphological changes that led to these widely diverse animal taxa. Finally, we focus on the challenging family of posterior Hox genes, which probably originated through independent tandem duplication events at the origin of each of the ambulacrarian, cephalochordate and vertebrate/urochordate lineages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
Norway 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 136 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 24%
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,036,544
of 23,486,774 outputs
Outputs from BMC Developmental Biology
#16
of 372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,986
of 196,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Developmental Biology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,486,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them