↓ Skip to main content

The role of natural health products (NHPs) in dietetic practice: results from a survey of Canadian dietitians

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of natural health products (NHPs) in dietetic practice: results from a survey of Canadian dietitians
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristine Hirschkorn, Rishma Walji, Heather Boon

Abstract

Registered dietitians (RDs) play a key role in disseminating information about nutrition and intervening in nutrition-related disorders in the Canadian context. Natural health products (NHPs) are increasingly associated with nutrition in patient and health professional discussions. For this study, NHPs were divided into three categories: nutritional supplements (NS); functional foods/nutraceuticals (FF/N); and herbal preparations (HP). The objective was to explore RDs' perceptions about their professional roles and responsibilities with respect to three categories of natural health products (NHPs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 33%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,496,252
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#839
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,522
of 194,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#20
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.