↓ Skip to main content

PFClust: a novel parameter free clustering algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PFClust: a novel parameter free clustering algorithm
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lazaros Mavridis, Neetika Nath, John BO Mitchell

Abstract

We present the algorithm PFClust (Parameter Free Clustering), which is able automatically to cluster data and identify a suitable number of clusters to group them into without requiring any parameters to be specified by the user. The algorithm partitions a dataset into a number of clusters that share some common attributes, such as their minimum expectation value and variance of intra-cluster similarity. A set of n objects can be clustered into any number of clusters from one to n, and there are many different hierarchical and partitional, agglomerative and divisive, clustering methodologies available that can be used to do this. Nonetheless, automatically determining the number of clusters present in a dataset constitutes a significant challenge for clustering algorithms. Identifying a putative optimum number of clusters to group the objects into involves computing and evaluating a range of clusterings with different numbers of clusters. However, there is no agreed or unique definition of optimum in this context. Thus, we test PFClust on datasets for which an external gold standard of 'correct' cluster definitions exists, noting that this division into clusters may be suboptimal according to other reasonable criteria. PFClust is heuristic in the sense that it cannot be described in terms of optimising any single simply-expressed metric over the space of possible clusterings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Sweden 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 64 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 31%
Computer Science 18 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Engineering 5 7%
Mathematics 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 6 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,926,808
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,683
of 7,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,956
of 194,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#39
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.