↓ Skip to main content

Learning styles and preferences for live and distance education: an example of a specialisation course in epidemiology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning styles and preferences for live and distance education: an example of a specialisation course in epidemiology
Published in
BMC Medical Education, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rolf HH Groenwold, Mirjam J Knol

Abstract

Distance learning through the internet is increasingly popular in higher education. However, it is unknown how participants in epidemiology courses value live vs. distance education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 13 27%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Social Sciences 8 16%
Computer Science 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,675,540
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,144
of 3,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,978
of 195,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.