↓ Skip to main content

A comparison approach to explain risks related to X-ray imaging for scoliosis, 2012 SOSORT award winner

Overview of attention for article published in Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison approach to explain risks related to X-ray imaging for scoliosis, 2012 SOSORT award winner
Published in
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-7161-8-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Pace, Leonardo Ricci, Stefano Negrini

Abstract

X-ray imaging is frequently used as diagnostic approach for scoliosis in children and adolescents. X-ray procedures are considered as justified only when expected benefits exceed related risks. While benefits are well known to physicians, radiological risk awareness can be vague, impeding an optimal communication with patients' parents and possibly leading to discomfort and anxiety. Objective of the study is the suggestion of a risk comparison approach for better communicating the radiological risks related to X-ray investigation of scoliosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 20 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Engineering 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
#120
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,346
of 206,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.