↓ Skip to main content

Maggot metabolites and their combinatory effects with antibiotic on Staphylococcus aureus

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maggot metabolites and their combinatory effects with antibiotic on Staphylococcus aureus
Published in
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1476-0711-10-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuchi Arora, Carl Baptista, Chu Sing Lim

Abstract

Maggot therapy has been in practice for effective debridement, disinfection and healing of chronic wounds. Due to their antiseptic action during wound healing, their metabolites have been investigated in the past for antibacterial activity. They have been particularly useful for treatment of wounds infected with multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics, on the other hand, can predispose bacteria to develop resistance. Substances that are able to modulate or delay the occurrence of resistance in bacteria are under investigation by many researchers around the world. In the present study, antibacterial activity in excretions/secretions (ES) from maggots of Lucilia cuprina blowfly was demonstrated. The extracts were also screened in combination with antibiotic, ciprofloxacin.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Lecturer 5 6%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,422,365
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#184
of 682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,515
of 196,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.