You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mutual interaction of neurons and astrocytes derived from iPSCs with APP V717L mutation developed the astrocytic phenotypes of Alzheimer’s disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Inflammation and Regeneration, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41232-023-00310-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sopak Supakul, Rei Murakami, Chisato Oyama, Tomoko Shindo, Yuki Hatakeyama, Maika Itsuno, Hiroko Bannai, Shinsuke Shibata, Sumihiro Maeda, Hideyuki Okano |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,848,961
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation and Regeneration
#51
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,675
of 171,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation and Regeneration
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them