You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tensiomyography method used for neuromuscular assessment of muscle training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-67 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ligia D Rusu, Germina GH Cosma, Sorina M Cernaianu, Mihnea N Marin, PetreFlorinel A Rusu, Daniel P Ciocănescu, Florin N Neferu |
| Abstract |
Within the structure of the skeletal muscle, there are fascicles of muscular fibers that are made up of serially distributed contractile elements. These elements are controlled by the nervous system, control which results in obtaining the muscular strength required for movement and its control. This study presents the neuromuscular assessment using tensiomyography method (TMG). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 21% |
| Unknown | 47 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 64 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,528,938
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#371
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,516
of 206,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#5
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.