↓ Skip to main content

Airway wall thickness on HRCT scans decreases with age and increases with smoking

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Airway wall thickness on HRCT scans decreases with age and increases with smoking
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12890-017-0363-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eef D. Telenga, Matthijs Oudkerk, Peter M. A. van Ooijen, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Nick H. T. ten Hacken, Dirkje S. Postma, Maarten van den Berge

Abstract

To investigate if age, gender and smoking are associated with airway wall thickness (AWT) measured by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and if higher AWT is associated with lower levels of pulmonary function in healthy current- and never-smokers with a wide age range. HRCT scans were performed in 99 subjects (48 never- and 51 current-smokers, median age 39 years [IQR 22 - 54], 57% males). The AWT at an internal perimeter of 10 mm (AWT Pi10) was calculated as an overall measurement of AWT, based on all measurements throughout the lungs. Extensive pulmonary function testing was performed in all subjects. Higher age was associated with a lower AWT Pi10 (b = -0.003, p < 0.001). Current-smokers had a higher AWT Pi10 than never-smokers (mean 0.49 mm versus 0.44 mm, p = 0.022). In multivariate analysis, age and current-smoking were independently associated with AWT Pi10 (age b = -0.002, p < 0.001, current-smoking b = 0.041, p = 0.021), whereas gender was not (b = 0.011, p = 0.552). Higher AWT Pi10 was associated with a lower FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25-75 and higher R5, R20 and X5. AWT decreases with higher age, possibly reflecting structural changes of the airways. Additionally, current-smokers have a higher AWT, possibly due to remodeling or inflammation. Finally, higher AWT is associated with a lower level of pulmonary function, even in this population of healthy subjects. This Study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with number NCT00848406 on 19 February 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 39%
Engineering 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#19,292,491
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1,504
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,481
of 424,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#26
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.