↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a joint workshop on study design for hospital and community pharmacists: a retrospective cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of a joint workshop on study design for hospital and community pharmacists: a retrospective cross-sectional survey
Published in
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, March 2024
DOI 10.1186/s40780-024-00337-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuki Asai, Yasushi Takai, Toshiki Murasaka, Tomohiro Miyake, Tomohisa Nakamura, Yoshihiko Morikawa, Yuji Nakagawa, Tatsuya Kanayama, Yasuharu Abe, Naoki Masuda, Yasushi Takamura, Yoshihiro Miki, Takuya Iwamoto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,209,029
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
#52
of 158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,021
of 249,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 158 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.