↓ Skip to main content

Clinical care for sexual assault survivors multimedia training: a mixed-methods study of effect on healthcare providers’ attitudes, knowledge, confidence, and practice in humanitarian settings

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical care for sexual assault survivors multimedia training: a mixed-methods study of effect on healthcare providers’ attitudes, knowledge, confidence, and practice in humanitarian settings
Published in
Conflict and Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1752-1505-7-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janel R Smith, Lara S Ho, Anne Langston, Neha Mankani, Anjuli Shivshanker, Dhammika Perera

Abstract

Sexual assault is a threat to public health in refugee and conflict affected settings, placing survivors at risk for unintended pregnancy, unsafe abortion, STIs, HIV, psychological trauma, and social stigma. In response, the International Rescue Committee developed a multimedia training tool to encourage competent, compassionate, and confidential clinical care for sexual assault survivors in low-resource settings. This study evaluated the effect of the training on healthcare providers' attitudes, knowledge, confidence, and practices in four countries.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Unknown 190 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 23%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 13 7%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 23%
Social Sciences 40 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Psychology 22 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 48 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,041,766
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#368
of 630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,544
of 199,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.