You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The cost of service quality improvements: tracking the flow of funds in social franchise networks in Myanmar
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-11-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Bishai, Amnesty LeFevre, Marc Theuss, Matt Boxshall, John D Hetherington, Min Zaw, Dominic Montagu |
| Abstract |
This paper examines the cost of quality improvements in Population Services International (PSI) Myanmar's social franchise operations from 2007 to 2009. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 21% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,778,071
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#242
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,361
of 206,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.