You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
OvidSP Medline-to-PubMed search filter translation: a methodology for extending search filter range to include PubMed's unique content
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-13-86 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raechel A Damarell, Jennifer J Tieman, Ruth M Sladek |
| Abstract |
PubMed translations of OvidSP Medline search filters offer searchers improved ease of access. They may also facilitate access to PubMed's unique content, including citations for the most recently published biomedical evidence. Retrieving this content requires a search strategy comprising natural language terms ('textwords'), rather than Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). We describe a reproducible methodology that uses a validated PubMed search filter translation to create a textword-only strategy to extend retrieval to PubMed's unique heart failure literature. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 14 | 32% |
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,882,431
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#260
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,964
of 194,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.