↓ Skip to main content

Functional analysis of distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional analysis of distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0519-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongmou Zhao, Wenqing Qu, Yi Li, Xiaojun Liang, Ning Ning, Yan Zhang, Dong Hu

Abstract

Ankle joint distraction arthroplasty (AJDA) is an alternative surgical procedure for the management of moderate to severe ankle osteoarthritis. However, the benefit of this procedure and failure relative factors are still in debate. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of AJDA in treatment of moderate to severe ankle OA and to evaluate the relative factors correlated with treatment failure. Forty-six van Dijk stages II and III ankle osteoarthritis patients were included. Fifteen males and 31 females with a mean age of 54.8 (range, 42-71) years were followed with a mean of 42.8 (range, 24-68) months. The Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score were used for functional outcome evaluation. The talar tilt (TT) angle and ankle joint space distance (AJSD) were evaluated. The risk ratio (RR) was calculated for each potential failure relative factor. The AOS and AOFAS scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up time (P < 0.01). The AJSD was improved in 61% of patients and with a significant improvement compared with the preoperative conditions (P < 0.01). The TT angle and range of motion reached no significant difference. The failure rate was 21.7%. Patients with large TT (≥5°) angle (RR = 3.81, 95% CI 1.28-11.33, P = 0.02) and obesity (RR = 3.58, 95% CI 1.30-9.89, P = 0.01) were found to have positive correlation with failure. No correlation was found between failure and gender, or overweight, or side, or age, or type and stage of OA, or pin infection. The current study confirmed the early functional outcomes of ankle distraction arthroplasty. However, this procedure still has a relatively high failure rate, especially for those obese patients and patients with large TT angles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 20%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Engineering 2 5%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unknown 14 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#18,529,032
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#958
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,733
of 418,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#17
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.