↓ Skip to main content

Hand, hip and knee osteoarthritis in a Norwegian population-based study - The MUST protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hand, hip and knee osteoarthritis in a Norwegian population-based study - The MUST protocol
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Østerås, May Arna Risberg, Tore K Kvien, Lars Engebretsen, Lars Nordsletten, Dag Bruusgaard, Unni-Berit Schjervheim, Ida K Haugen, Hilde Berner Hammer, Sella Provan, Britt Elin Øiestad, Anne Grete Semb, Silvia Rollefstad, Kåre Birger Hagen, Till Uhlig, Barbara Slatkowsky-Christensen, Ingvild Kjeken, Gunnar Flugsrud, Margreth Grotle, Sølve Sesseng, Hanne Edvardsen, Bård Natvig

Abstract

Knowledge about the prevalence and consequences of osteoarthritis (OA) in the Norwegian population is limited. This study has been designed to gain a greater understanding of musculoskeletal pain in the general population with a focus on clinically and radiologically confirmed OA, as well as risk factors, consequences, and management of OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Lecturer 6 7%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,154,315
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,817
of 4,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,561
of 194,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#39
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.