↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of a group-based cognitive behavioural therapy-based indicative prevention program for children with elevated anxiety levels

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of a group-based cognitive behavioural therapy-based indicative prevention program for children with elevated anxiety levels
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manon LA van Starrenburg, Rowella CWM Kuijpers, Giel JM Hutschemaekers, Rutger CME Engels

Abstract

Anxiety is a problem for many children, particularly because of its negative consequences not only on the wellbeing of the child, but also on society. Adequate prevention and treatment might be the key in tackling this problem. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been found effective for treating anxiety disorders. "Coping Cat" is one of the few evidence-based CBT programs designed to treat anxiety symptoms in children. The main aim of this project is to conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of a Dutch version of Coping Cat as an indicative group-based prevention program. The second aim is to gain insight into the mechanisms underlying its effectiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 20%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 91 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Social Sciences 18 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 50 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,369
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,844
of 4,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,930
of 194,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#61
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.