You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Over-distension of the airways by mechanical ventilation in the elderly: adding insult to injury
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc12754 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aurora Pop-Vicas, Steven M Opal |
Abstract |
Setzer and colleagues demonstrate that older animals are more susceptible to ventilator-induced lung injury than young animals and develop a more pronounced local and systemic cytokine response to high tidal volumes. These data have significant implications for older patients receiving mechanical ventilation if these findings can be translated to human critical care medicine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 45% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,970
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,248
of 206,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#81
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.