↓ Skip to main content

The bee tree of life: a supermatrix approach to apoid phylogeny and biogeography

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The bee tree of life: a supermatrix approach to apoid phylogeny and biogeography
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-13-138
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shannon M Hedtke, Sébastien Patiny, Bryan N Danforth

Abstract

Bees are the primary pollinators of angiosperms throughout the world. There are more than 16,000 described species, with broad variation in life history traits such as nesting habitat, diet, and social behavior. Despite their importance as pollinators, the evolution of bee biodiversity is understudied: relationships among the seven families of bees remain controversial, and no empirical global-level reconstruction of historical biogeography has been attempted. Morphological studies have generally suggested that the phylogeny of bees is rooted near the family Colletidae, whereas many molecular studies have suggested a root node near (or within) Melittidae. Previous molecular studies have focused on a relatively small sample of taxa (~150 species) and genes (seven at most). Public databases contain an enormous amount of DNA sequence data that has not been comprehensively analysed in the context of bee evolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 341 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 23%
Student > Master 60 17%
Researcher 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Professor 18 5%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 50 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 223 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 8%
Environmental Science 23 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 1%
Engineering 3 <1%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 63 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,242,689
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#560
of 3,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,443
of 207,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#11
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.