You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurovascular abnormalities in brain disorders: highlights with angiogenesis and magnetic resonance imaging studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1423-0127-20-47 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chiao-Chi V Chen, Yu-Chen Chen, Han-Yun Hsiao, Chen Chang, Yijuang Chern |
| Abstract |
The coupling between neuronal activity and vascular responses is controlled by the neurovascular unit (NVU), which comprises multiple cell types. Many different types of dysfunction in these cells may impair the proper control of vascular responses by the NVU. Magnetic resonance imaging, which is the most powerful tool available to investigate neurovascular structures or functions, will be discussed in the present article in relation to its applications and discoveries. Because aberrant angiogenesis and vascular remodeling have been increasingly reported as being implicated in brain pathogenesis, this review article will refer to this hallmark event when suitable. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 28% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#656
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,224
of 206,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.