↓ Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies for Accelerating Cervical Cancer Elimination through the integration of Screen-and-treat Services (ACCESS study): protocol for a cluster…

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies for Accelerating Cervical Cancer Elimination through the integration of Screen-and-treat Services (ACCESS study): protocol for a cluster randomized hybrid type III trial in Nigeria
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13012-024-01349-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Babayemi O. Olakunde, Ijeoma U. Itanyi, John O. Olawepo, Lin Liu, Chinenye Bembir, Ngozi Idemili-Aronu, Nwamaka N. Lasebikan, Tonia C. Onyeka, Cyril C. Dim, Chibuike O. Chigbu, Echezona E. Ezeanolue, Gregory A. Aarons

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Lecturer 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,098,428
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,248
of 1,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,735
of 283,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.