↓ Skip to main content

Adolescents’ prospective screen time by gender and parental education, the mediation of parental influences

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 2,116)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adolescents’ prospective screen time by gender and parental education, the mediation of parental influences
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-89
Pubmed ID
Authors

Torunn H Totland, Mona Bjelland, Nanna Lien, Ingunn H Bergh, Mekdes K Gebremariam, May Grydeland, Yngvar Ommundsen, Lene F Andersen

Abstract

The present study investigated associations in gender dyads of parents' and adolescents' time spent on television and video viewing (TV/DVD), and computer and electronic game use (PC/games) at the ages of 11 and 13 years. Possible mediating effects of parental modelling and parental regulation in the relationship between parental education and adolescents' prospective TV/DVD and PC/game time were further examined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 20%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 8 5%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 47 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 27 16%
Psychology 19 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Sports and Recreations 13 8%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 51 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 252. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#146,242
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#33
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#885
of 206,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.