You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bacterial DnaK reduces the activity of anti-cancer drugs cisplatin and 5FU
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-024-05078-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesca Benedetti, Emmanuel F. Mongodin, Jonathan H. Badger, Arshi Munawwar, Ashley Cellini, Weirong Yuan, Giovannino Silvestri, Carl N. Kraus, Simone Marini, Chozha V. Rathinam, Marco Salemi, Hervé Tettelin, Robert C. Gallo, Davide Zella |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,866,333
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#871
of 4,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,670
of 168,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#13
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.