You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Needle, knife, or device – which choice in an airway crisis?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1757-7241-21-49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Crewdson, David J Lockey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 75% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,732,028
of 23,952,301 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#153
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,972
of 199,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,952,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.