↓ Skip to main content

Treatment outcomes of fixed-dose combination versus separate tablet regimens in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with or without diabetes in Qatar

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment outcomes of fixed-dose combination versus separate tablet regimens in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with or without diabetes in Qatar
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12879-017-2231-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad H. Al-Shaer, Hanine Mansour, Hazem Elewa, Pascale Salameh, Fatima Iqbal

Abstract

Tuberculosis is considered the second most common cause of death due to infectious agent. The currently preferred regimen for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, which has been used either as separate tablets (ST) or as fixed-dose combination (FDC). To date, no studies have compared both regimens in Qatar. We aim to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of FDC and ST regimen for treating PTB, in addition to comparing safety and efficacy of FDC and ST regimens in patients with diabetes treated for TB. A retrospective observational study was conducted in two general hospitals in Qatar. Patients diagnosed with PTB received anti-tuberculosis medications (either as FDC or ST) administered by the nurse. Sputum smears were tested weekly. We assessed the time to negative sputum smear and incidence of adverse events among FDC and ST groups. The study included 148 patients. FDC was used in 90 patients (61%). Effectiveness was not different between FDC and ST regimens as shown by mean time to sputum conversion (29.9 ± 18.3 vs. 35.6 ± 23 days, p = 0.12). Similarly, there was no difference in the incidence of adverse events, except for visual one that was higher in ST group. Among the 33 diabetic patients, 19 received the FDC and had faster sputum conversion compared to those who received ST (31 ± 12 vs. 49.4 ± 30.9 days, p = 0.05). Overall, diabetic patients needed longer time for sputum conversion and had more hepatotoxic and gastric adverse events compared to non-diabetics. ST group had higher visual side effects compared to FDC. FDC may be more effective in diabetic patients; however, further studies are required to confirm such finding.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 24 33%