You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cataloging the phylogenetic diversity of human bladder bacterial isolates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-024-03216-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jingjie Du, Mark Khemmani, Thomas Halverson, Adriana Ene, Roberto Limeira, Lana Tinawi, Baylie R. Hochstedler-Kramer, Melline Fontes Noronha, Catherine Putonti, Alan J. Wolfe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 45% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,085,310
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,291
of 4,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,476
of 171,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.