You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Measuring emergency department crowding in an inner city hospital in The Netherlands
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1865-1380-6-21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martijn Anneveld, Christien van der Linden, Diana Grootendorst, Martha Galli-Leslie |
Abstract |
Overcrowding in the emergency department (ED) is an increasing problem worldwide. In The Netherlands overcrowding is not a major issue, although some urban hospitals struggle with increased throughput. In 2004, Weiss et al. created the NEDOCS tool (National Emergency Department Over Crowding Study), a web-based instrument to measure objective overcrowding with scores between 0 (not busy at all) to above 181 (disaster). In this study we tried to validate the accuracy of the NEDOCS tool by comparing this with the subjective feelings of the ED nurse and emergency physician (EP) in an inner city hospital in The Netherlands. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Egypt | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 87 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 27% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 21% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,848,721
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#262
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,133
of 206,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.