↓ Skip to main content

Bad air, amulets and mosquitoes: 2,000 years of changing perspectives on malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 5,659)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
228 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
17 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bad air, amulets and mosquitoes: 2,000 years of changing perspectives on malaria
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ernst Hempelmann, Kristine Krafts

Abstract

For many centuries, scientists have debated the cause and best treatment of the disease now known as malaria. Two theories regarding malaria transmission -- that of "bad air" and that of insect vectors -- have been widely accepted at different times throughout history. Treatments and cures have varied accordingly over time. This paper traces the evolution of scientific consensus on malaria aetiology, transmission, and treatment from ancient times to the present day.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 228 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 227 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 19%
Student > Master 44 19%
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 46 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 5%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 54 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2022.
All research outputs
#154,665
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#18
of 5,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,009
of 195,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#3
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.