↓ Skip to main content

Bad air, amulets and mosquitoes: 2,000 years of changing perspectives on malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 5,506)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
234 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
17 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bad air, amulets and mosquitoes: 2,000 years of changing perspectives on malaria
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ernst Hempelmann, Kristine Krafts

Abstract

For many centuries, scientists have debated the cause and best treatment of the disease now known as malaria. Two theories regarding malaria transmission -- that of "bad air" and that of insect vectors -- have been widely accepted at different times throughout history. Treatments and cures have varied accordingly over time. This paper traces the evolution of scientific consensus on malaria aetiology, transmission, and treatment from ancient times to the present day.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 234 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 218 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 20%
Student > Master 44 20%
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 5%
Other 49 22%
Unknown 49 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 218. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#141,649
of 22,557,175 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#16
of 5,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#865
of 175,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,557,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them