The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 238 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bad air, amulets and mosquitoes: 2,000 years of changing perspectives on malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-12-232 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ernst Hempelmann, Kristine Krafts |
| Abstract |
For many centuries, scientists have debated the cause and best treatment of the disease now known as malaria. Two theories regarding malaria transmission -- that of "bad air" and that of insect vectors -- have been widely accepted at different times throughout history. Treatments and cures have varied accordingly over time. This paper traces the evolution of scientific consensus on malaria aetiology, transmission, and treatment from ancient times to the present day. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 198 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 202 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 8% |
| Scientists | 14 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 255 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 21% |
| Unknown | 71 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#174,363
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#19
of 6,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,030
of 208,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#2
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.