You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Empirical evidence of delays in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-regression analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7026-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Segun Bello, Rotimi Felix Afolabi, David Taiwo Ajayi, Tarang Sharma, Deborah Olamiposi Owoeye, Omobola Oduyoye, Joseph Jasanya |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 22% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#845,895
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#899
of 17,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,214
of 367,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#29
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.